TRANSFER PRICING - NEGOTIATED BASIS
by Kent Edward Baxter 1 December 1999
The
purpose of negotiated transfer prices are their use in situations where market
prices are prone to sudden changes. The final negotiated transfer price results
from bargaining between the buying and selling parties. Bargaining usually
involves standards and conditions being set by both parties. For example, the
purchasing party may make a condition that the cost of a unit of raw material
must be a certain amount.
In the realm of negotiations, subunits or divisions of a company have the
freedom to negotiate a transfer price between themselves, and then to make a
decision as whether to make transactions internally, or make deals with outside
parties. During negotiations, the subunits can use information on costs and
market prices, yet no requirement is given that the chosen transfer price be
directly or uniquely related to market price or cost data.
Firms with interrelated activities in different countries must satisfy tax authorities that they are not evading taxes through the use of transfer prices. To do this, they must review all regulations and laws regarding taxation and transfer pricing rules and practices.
Implications of taxation can and often do arise from transfer pricing.
From country to country, rates and factors such as income taxes, payroll taxes,
regulations, duties, tariffs, sales (consumption) taxes, value added taxes, environmental
and social taxes, plus regulations and levies may vary to different degrees.
Negotiations must be privy to all foreign investment-related information,
as there may be certain benefits - for example, certain countries may have some
have tax incentives, providing transfer price regulations are followed.
If one company is dealing with another in a similar line of operations,
negotiations must be conducted carefully (with all factors being taken into
consideration) so that violations of anti-trust laws and competition acts will
be avoided. This isn't likely to be a problem with most foreign dealings, mainly
domestic companies. GM and Toyota are unlikely to be penalized for joint
ventures, not unlike if GM and Ford were to take part in a similar project.
Foreign
negotiations should take into consideration the following questions:
-
Are there, or will there be any tariffs of duties on the potential goods to be
traded?
-
What are government regulations and controls for multinational corporations
placed by foreign governments?
Example:
Canada's FIRA (Foreign Investment Review Agency) was a body
-
Are there limits on foreign investment in certain sectors of the economy?
Example: foreign investment in the privately-owned Australian media is
restricted to 25%
-
Has the currency been suitably stable?
-
Are there requirement s for governments to make the final decision, based on
satisfactory criteria?
Although there is [generally] no requirement that the negotiated transfer
price resemble or come close to market prices, there is the possibility that a
government within the jurisdiction of one of the parties may intervene, and set
a pricing standard. Canada has introduced such a matter. An initiative that went
into effect on 1 January 1998 specified that 'all
transactions between taxpayers and related entities located outside Canada must
take place at fair market value.'
When dealing in foreign markets, corporations need to take into
consideration the issue of how competitive the market in question is from region
to region within a country, such as in the case of provinces (or states), and
territories. The revenue, finance and taxation departments of these entities may
provide certain transfer pricing arrangements, as well as analytical
perspectives and guidance from the profession. In addition, the company may have
economists specializing in specific international markets.
Related to the above factor, there may be additional taxation and
regulations if the country where an investment is to take place is a federation,
such as Canada or Australia, where provinces (or states) may have different
corporate guidelines.
If dealing with a foreign country, currency fluctuations must be taken
into consideration if the country in question had had currency problems -
purchasing power may be affected, more so the balance of trade. A devalued
foreign currency may have a positive benefit for the foreign-based purchasing
party as more goods could be acquired at a lower cost, although not necessarily
for the domestic (selling) party.
Divisions within a company with the autonomy to negotiate freely (or any
deal maker, for that matter) should negotiate with the bottom line being
whatever is in the best interest for that entity, what is best for that
division, not just the entire company, since the financial well-being could
differ greatly.
As an important note for negotiations, feedback should be collected from
both parties and their entities, as some elements specified may effect them. The
more information that each side is privy to as a whole, the greater chance there
is for success.